PDF

URL

BibTeX

DOI

Abstract. Nature-based climate solutions supply carbon credits generated from net carbon drawdown in exchange for project funding, but their credibility is challenged by the inherent variability and impermanence of drawdown. By evaluating drawdown benefits from a social cost of carbon perspective, project developers can enhance credibility and estimate impermanence by conservatively anticipating drawdowns to be eventually released following a release schedule, issuing additional credits when actual release is less severe than anticipated.

We demonstrate how we can use ex post observations of drawdowns to construct optimal release schedules that limit the risk of failing to generate credits (non-delivery). We simulate both theoretical and real-life projects to examine how this approach balances the trade-off between generating credits evaluated as more permanent and limiting non-delivery risk. We discuss how this approach incentivises project performance and provides a pragmatic solution to challenges facing larger-scale implementation of nature-based climate solutions.

Authors. E.-Ping Rau, James Gross, David A Coomes, Thomas Swinfield, Anil Madhavapeddy, Andrew Balmford and Srinivasan Keshav

See Also. This publication was part of the Trusted Carbon Credits project.

Previous Revisions. There are also earlier revisions of this paper available below. Please cite only the latest version of the paper above where possible.

News Updates

Sep 2024. «» Discuss the NbS risks paper.

Aug 2024. «» Discussion on the nature-based credits article / «» Paper on ex-ante projection for nature-based solutions.

Mar 2024. «» Preprint on forecasting nature based project risk.

Mar 2023. «» Discussion with Mantle Labs about carbon credits.

Nov 2022. «» Wednesday seminar on financing forests using carbon credits.

May 2022. «» Quoted in Vox article on carbon credits.

Sep 2021. «» Started maintaining (sporadically) a note on a forest preservation and restoration bibliography.